Language and explanations appear to be very modern. Reeves provides quotes, anecdotes, and illustrations from church history, his Sometimes wondered if Reeves was being novel in a “hasn’t-quite- stood-the-test-of-time”ġ) if Reeve’s teaching was rooted in history, and 2) if other authors with But the fact and shame of the matter is that theīook’s topic is new to many experienced Christians. I suspect the choice of subtitle reflects the publisher’sĭesire for the subject to be "introductory" in the foundational sense rather than the new information sense. New to me, but it might also be because it is not always easy to understand. I had thought this was because of the richness of the content or because it was
Thought I must admit I have had to read it several times in order to digest it. Own first impression was that it was written at a lay level. Group by stating, “I am glad I did not invite anyone to this Bible study,īecause the book is difficult to read.” My One parishioner reflected the attitude of the The subject was too difficult to be an appropriate introduction for newĬhristians.
The group thought the book was poorly subtitled as An Introduction to the
Difficult to digest than it purports to be.
0 kommentar(er)
